ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5-N1471 Results of the ballot on Corrigendum 2 John Reid, 26 November 2001 Dedo n Kruyt y Li yc Long yc Maine y Meadows y Morgan y Muxworthy n Snyder yc Takata yc Whitlock y ........................................................... I have amended Corrigendum 2 (see N1472) in response to the comments and deleted the edit for JP-17, which failed the other WG5 ballot (see N1470). The amended Corrigendum therefore passes unanimously. ........................................................... REASONS FOR NO VOTES Muxworthy The edits from interpretation 95 are missing from the draft corrigendum. The edit from interpretation 97 is incorrectly labelled 95 (although that will not affect the text of the final version). Otherwise the draft corrigendum corresponds with the agreed interpretations. Dedo I agree with the observation of David Muxworthy. If this is fixed, i will change my vote to YES. JKR response: I agree and have made this change. COMMENTS Bill Long, Cray In the first line of the text for the edit to Page 215, the quote "may be the same variables" should be "may be the same variable". JKR response: I agree and have made this change. Kelvin Li, XL Fortran Compiler Development, IBM Toronto Lab We have two minor comments on the Corrigendum 2. Page 48, Subclause 5.1 Change "object-name" to italic form. Page 258, Subclause 13.14.74 In line 2 of page 258, delete "If P .ne. 0,". ("the" is not in the text of the standard) JKR response: I agree and have made these changes. Van Snyder Page 160. Insert "a" after "or" in the edit. JKR response: I agree and have made this change. Masayuki Takata Page 3, in the first line of the edit: Change 'an' to 'two', or something better. Pages 45 and 46, at the end of the first edit: Add a full stop. Page 62, in the first edit: Delete '=>', which is not in N1467. Page 66, at the end of the second edit: Add a full stop. Page 113, in the last line: Make '' into subscripted form. Page 136, in the third line: Change ', or' to 'or'. Page 194, similar changes as in Page 136, twice. Page 209, in the first line: Change 'Change ""' to 'change "."'. Page 258, in the first edit: Change 'change' to 'delete', and delete 'to "The"'. Page 322, the location: Change '<>' to '<>'. JKR response: I agree with all your suggestions except those for pages 136 and 194. It is the style of the Standard to include commas in situations such as these. See, for example, 112/12. In some cases, it can prevent ambiguities. I have made all the other changes.