ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1527

	            
              Typos and editorial trivia in 03-007
                    
                         Richard Maine

This paper has edits to correct some typos and editorial trivia
in 03-007.  All page and line references are to 03-007.

Aleksander Donev pointed out the following typos

  [59:Note 4.51]  Reformat the example as

     TYPE, ABSTRACT :: FILE_HANDLE
     CONTAINS
        PROCEDURE(OPEN_FILE), DEFERRED, PASS(HANDLE) :: OPEN
        ...
     END TYPE

  [445:36] Indent this line like the REAL declarations earlier.

Dick Hendrickson pointed out the following

  [44:19] "accessibile" -> "accessible"

  [47:Note 4.24 2nd line] "to to" -> "to"

  [47:16] "sitype-param-decl" -> "<type-param-decl>"

  [55:10] "<interace>" -> "<interface>"

  [164:23] "paraqmeter" -> "parameter"

  [299:29] "allocatiom" -> "allocation"

  [340:Note 13.15 2nd line] "transfering" -> "transferring"

  [449:12] The wrong style of dash was typeset, but instead of
  just changing the dash, a better edit is "-so" -> ";".

  Section 10 has 3 cases of "nondelimited" and 1 of "undelimited".
  I agree with Dick that "undelimited" sounds better, so I propose
  changing "[a] nondelimited" to "[an] undelimited" at [240:21],
  [241:6], [243:3], and [248:4].  Alternatively, we could change
  "undelimited" to "nondelimited" at [246:Note 10.35 3rd line].
  Don't do both edits.  (If this paper passes without directions
  otherwise, do the 4 changes instead of the alternative one.)

James Giles pointed out the following

  [308:8] "=\pi" -> "-\pi"  (where \pi means the math symbol).

And on my own initiative...

The word "since" is best reserved for contexts where it refers to
time.  Some of the uses in the draft are appropriate, but others
are not.  In some cases, it is potentially confusing because time
is involved in the sentence, but that isn't what the "since" is
referring to.

  "since" -> "because" (retaining capitalization) at

    [8:34], [12:Note 2.2], [45:Note 4.21 line 6] [49:Note 4.27],
    [277:Note 12.31], [347:21], [368:20],
    [414:Note 16.10 line 19], [440:38], [465:25]

  "since" -> "in that" at [441:7]
  (Both "since" and "because" seem wrong here)