ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1765

          WG5 letter ballot 6 on Fortran 2003 interpretations
                      John Reid, 2 December 2008

This is the sixth set of draft interpretations for Fortran 2003.  They
have all been approved in a J3 letter ballot. 

The rules we operate on say:

4. The chair of J3/interp gathers all interp answers that are marked
   "passed by J3 letter ballot" and forwards them to the WG5 convenor.
   The WG5 convenor holds a ballot of individual members; a no vote
   must be accompanied by an explanation of the changes necessary to
   change the member's vote to yes. The answers that pass this ballot
   become "WG5 approved".

   J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for more
   study even if the answer passes.

5. "WG5 approved" answers are processed into a corrigendum document by
   taking the edits from the interp answers and putting them in the
   format required by ISO.  A WG5 vote is made on forwarding the
   corrigendum to SC22.

The following Fortran 2003 interpretations are being balloted:

Yes   No   Number     Title
---   ---  F95/0074   TARGET dummy arguments and POINTER expressions
---   ---  F95/0102   mask-expr evaluated only once
---   ---  F03/0049   Separators in list-directed output involving UDDTIO
---   ---  F03/0073   C interop of dummy procedures
---   ---  F03/0074   Type mismatch for C character arguments
---   ---  F03/0075   C interop of derived types with array components
---   ---  F03/0076   Scope of Fortran names of procedures with binding
                      labels
---   ---  F03/0077   LBOUND of array structure component
---   ---  F03/0081   F edit descriptor with field width 0
---   ---  F03/0082   VALUE in place of INTENT for pure procedure dummy
                      arguments
---   ---  F03/0087   Entry names as dummy procedure arguments
---   ---  F03/0098   Does allocate with source= define subcomponents?
---   ---  F03/0099   Clause 16 does not account for volatile variable
---   ---  F03/0102   Evaluation of bound-expr in data pointer assignment
---   ---  F03/0109   Referencing deferred binding via absent dummy argument
---   ---  F03/0111   Is defined assignment to a vector subscripted
                      array allowed?
---   ---  F03/0113   Size and uniqueness considerations for ID=
---   ---  F03/0114   Inconsistent restrictions on i/o specifiers
---   ---  F03/0117   STOP executed via function in input/output list

The text of these interpretations is in N1764 (or 08-006Ar4).  Each 
interpretation starts with a row of "-"s.

Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send to

        sc22wg5@open-std.org

by 8 a.m (UK time) on Monday, 19 January 2008, in order to be counted.

Thanks,

John.