ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1877

          WG5 letter ballot 2 on Fortran 2008 interpretations
                      John Reid, 7 September 2011

This is the second WG5 vote on a set of draft interpretations for Fortran 
2008. They have all been approved in a J3 letter ballot.  

The rules we operate on say:
--- ---
4. The chair of J3/interp gathers all interp answers that are marked
   "passed by J3 letter ballot" and forwards them to the WG5 convenor.
   The WG5 convenor holds a ballot of individual members; a no vote
   must be accompanied by an explanation of the changes necessary to
   change the member's vote to yes. The answers that pass this ballot
   become "WG5 approved".

   J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for more
   study even if the answer passes.

5. "WG5 approved" answers are processed into a corrigendum document by
   taking the edits from the interp answers and putting them in the
   format required by ISO.  A WG5 vote is made on forwarding the
   corrigendum to SC22.

The following Fortran 2003 interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No Number     Title
--- --- F08/0021   STORAGE_SIZE and unlimited polymorphic
--- --- F08/0022   DO CONCURRENT and file i/o
--- --- F08/0023   DO CONCURRENT and POINTER
--- --- F08/0024   Dummy arguments of impure elemental procedures
--- --- F08/0025   DO CONCURRENT and ALLOCATABLE
--- --- F08/0026   DO CONCURRENT and output interleaving
--- --- F08/0027   ATOMIC_REF example
--- --- F08/0028   Does a procedure reference cause loop termination?
--- --- F08/0029   G0 edit descriptor and floating-point output
--- --- F08/0030   Unlimited format repeat effects
--- --- F08/0031   PURE INTENT(OUT) finalization
--- --- F08/0032   PURE FUNCTION result finalization
--- --- F08/0033   PURE polymorphic finalization
--- --- F08/0034   ELEMENTAL INTENT(OUT) finalization
--- --- F08/0035   Maximum value for SHIFT argument to SHIFTL
                   and SHIFTR
--- --- F08/0036   NORM2 example in Annex C
--- --- F08/0037   PROCEDURE POINTER vs PROTECTED
--- --- F08/0038   Are pointless restrictions on DIM arguments
                   intended?
--- --- F08/0039   Many-one vector subscript usage
--- --- F08/0040   MOVE_ALLOC for coarrays
--- --- F08/0042   SOURCE= questions
--- --- F08/0043   Executing a type-bound procedure on a coindexed
                   object
--- --- F08/0044   Resolving the type of a coarray or coindexed object
--- --- F08/0046   VALUE attribute restrictions
--- --- F08/0047   public generic with same name as private type
--- --- F08/0049   ELEMENTAL functions with nonconstant type parameters
--- --- F08/0050   Ordering requirements on definition of specification
                   functions
--- --- F08/0051   Pure procedure arguments with VALUE
--- --- F08/0052   Private type-bound procedures
--- --- F08/0053   Restrictions on generic declarations, generic
                   resolution
--- --- F08/0054   Requirements for needing an explicit interface

The text of these interpretations is in N1875.  Each interpretation starts 
there with a row of "-"s.

Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send to

        sc22wg5@open-std.org

by 0900 UK time on Wednesday, 5 October 2011, in order to be counted.

Thanks,

John.