ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1933

          WG5 letter ballot 3 on Fortran 2008 interpretations
                      John Reid, 3 August 2012

This is the third WG5 vote on a set of draft interpretations for Fortran 
2008. They have all been approved in a J3 letter ballot.  

The rules we operate on say:
--- ---
4. The chair of J3/interp gathers all interp answers that are marked
   "passed by J3 letter ballot" and forwards them to the WG5 convenor.
   The WG5 convenor holds a ballot of individual members; a no vote
   must be accompanied by an explanation of the changes necessary to
   change the member's vote to yes. The answers that pass this ballot
   become "WG5 approved".

   J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for more
   study even if the answer passes.

5. "WG5 approved" answers are processed into a corrigendum document by
   taking the edits from the interp answers and putting them in the
   format required by ISO.  A WG5 vote is made on forwarding the
   corrigendum to SC22.

The following Fortran 2003 interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No Number     Title
---  ---  F03/0017   Dummy procedure pointers and PRESENT
---  ---  F03/0018   Multiple identical specific procedures in
                      type-bound generic interfaces
---  ---  F03/0019   Multiple identical specific procedures in
                      generic interface blocks
---  ---  F03/0021   What kind of token is a stop code?
---  ---  F03/0046   Unlimited polymorphic pointers in
                      common blocks
---  ---  F03/0053   The BIND attribute for C_PTR and C_FUNPTR
---  ---  F03/0065   Relational equivalence
---  ---  F03/0084   IEEE_SET_ROUNDING_MODE in a subroutine
---  ---  F03/0096   Can a read statement change the unit value?
---  ---  F03/0103   Restrictions on dummy arguments not present for
                      polymorphic type or parameterized derived type
---  ---  F03/0116   indistinguishable specifics for a generic
                      interface with use association
---  ---  F03/0118   Are lower bounds of assumed-shape arrays assumed?
---  ---  F03/0120   When are parameterized sequence types the same
                      type?
---  ---  F03/0121   Precise FP semantics of the REAL intrinsic
---  ---  F08/0004   Is TARGET argument of ASSOCIATED a pointer or
                      nonpointer dummy?
---  ---  F08/0008   IEEE exceptions for intrinsic functions
---  ---  F08/0031   PURE INTENT(OUT) finalization
---  ---  F08/0032   PURE FUNCTION result finalization
---  ---  F08/0038   Are pointless restrictions on DIM arguments
                      intended?
---  ---  F08/0040   MOVE_ALLOC for coarrays
---  ---  F08/0042   SOURCE= questions

The text of these interpretations is in N1932.  Each interpretation starts 
there with a row of "-"s.

Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send to

        sc22wg5@open-std.org

by 0900 UK time on Friday, 31 August 2012, in order to be counted.

Thanks,

John.