ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1988 WG5 letter ballot 6 on Fortran 2008 interpretations John Reid, 4 August 2013 This is the sixth WG5 vote on a set of draft interpretations for Fortran 2008. They have all been approved in a J3 letter ballot. The rules we operate on say: --- --- 4. The chair of J3/interp gathers all interp answers that are marked "passed by J3 letter ballot" and forwards them to the WG5 convenor. The WG5 convenor holds a ballot of individual members; a no vote must be accompanied by an explanation of the changes necessary to change the member's vote to yes. The answers that pass this ballot become "WG5 approved". J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for more study even if the answer passes. 5. "WG5 approved" answers are processed into a corrigendum document by taking the edits from the interp answers and putting them in the format required by ISO. A WG5 vote is made on forwarding the corrigendum to SC22. The following Fortran 2008 interpretations are being balloted: Yes No Number Title --- --- F03/0030 IEEE divide by zero --- --- F03/0047 Polymorphic arguments to intrinsic procedures --- --- F03/0053 The BIND attribute for C_PTR and C_FUNPTR --- --- F03/0064 Recursive declaration of procedure interfaces --- --- F03/0100 Error in field width for special cases of signed INFINITY output --- --- F03/0139 Functions returning procedure pointers --- --- F08/0071 Vector subscript target --- --- F08/0075 Pointer function reference as variable in assignment --- --- F08/0076 Pointer function reference in READ Subsumed by F07/0075 --- --- F08/0083 Type parameter default expressions allow circular dependence --- --- F08/0084 Pointer arguments to PURE functions --- --- F08/0085 Problems with PARAMETERs --- --- F08/0086 Implied-shape and separate PARAMETER statement --- --- F08/0087 Mixed-kind character assignment --- --- F08/0088 Can ALLOCATE with SOURCE= have side-effects in a PURE proc? --- --- F08/0089 Variable-denoting functions change existing semantics --- --- F08/0090 What restrictions apply to initialization and PARAMETER? The text of these interpretations is in N1987. Each interpretation starts there with a row of "-"s. Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no" answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send to sc22wg5@open-std.org by 0900 UK time on Monday, 2 September 2013, in order to be counted. Thanks, John.