ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1992 WG5 letter ballot 7 on Fortran 2008 interpretations John Reid, 24 September 2013 This is the seventh WG5 vote on a set of draft interpretations for Fortran 2008. They have all been approved in a J3 letter ballot. The rules we operate on say: --- --- 4. The chair of J3/interp gathers all interp answers that are marked "passed by J3 letter ballot" and forwards them to the WG5 convenor. The WG5 convenor holds a ballot of individual members; a no vote must be accompanied by an explanation of the changes necessary to change the member's vote to yes. The answers that pass this ballot become "WG5 approved". J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for more study even if the answer passes. 5. "WG5 approved" answers are processed into a corrigendum document by taking the edits from the interp answers and putting them in the format required by ISO. A WG5 vote is made on forwarding the corrigendum to SC22. The following Fortran 2008 interpretations are being balloted: Yes No Number Title --- --- F08/0091 Derived type with no components --- --- F08/0092 Derived type parameter requirements --- --- F08/0093 Process exit status and error termination --- --- F08/0094 Procedure statement and double colon --- --- F08/0095 Is PRESENT allowed in specification and constant expressions --- --- F08/0096 Is VALUE permitted for an array in a BIND(C) procedure? --- --- F08/0097 Is the optional comma allowed in TYPE(CHARACTER*...)? --- --- F08/0098 How many ACQUIRED_LOCK= specifiers are allowed in a LOCK stmt? The text of these interpretations is in N1991. Each interpretation starts there with a row of "-"s. Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no" answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send to sc22wg5@open-std.org by 0900 UK time on Monday, 28 October 2013, in order to be counted. Thanks, John.