ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N2061

          WG5 straw ballot 9 on Fortran 2008 interpretations
                      John Reid, 21 July 2015

This is the ninth WG5 vote on a set of draft interpretations for Fortran 
2008. They have all been approved in a J3 letter ballot.  

The rules we operate on say:
--- ---
4. The chair of J3/interp gathers all interp answers that are marked
   "passed by J3 letter ballot" and forwards them to the WG5 convenor.
   The WG5 convenor holds a ballot of individual members; a no vote
   must be accompanied by an explanation of the changes necessary to
   change the member's vote to yes. The answers that pass this ballot
   become "WG5 approved".

   J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for more
   study even if the answer passes.

5. "WG5 approved" answers are processed into a corrigendum document by
   taking the edits from the interp answers and putting them in the
   format required by ISO.  A WG5 vote is made on forwarding the
   corrigendum to SC22.

The following Fortran 2008 interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No   Number     Title
---  --- F08/0105   Is the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute allowed with the
                    VALUE attribute?
---  --- F08/0110   Interdependence of specifier values in input/output
                    statements
---  --- F08/0115   ASYNCHRONOUS and argument passing
---  --- F08/0116   Interoperable procedures
---  --- F08/0117   TARGET and coindexed arguments
---  --- F08/0118   Subobject of variable in variable definition context
---  --- F08/0119   Branching to END BLOCK and END CRITICAL
---  --- F08/0120   Is the name of a procedure pointer a local identifier?
---  --- F08/0121   Add to introduction defined operations in specification
                   exprs
---  --- F08/0122   Types with coarray components
---  --- F08/0123   SPACING intrinsic
---  --- F08/0124   Coindexed object with polymorphic subcomponent
---  --- F08/0126  Can cobounds be referenced in the same type
                  declaration?
---  --- F08/0127  May an initial line begin with a semicolon?
---  --- F08/0129  Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type
                  definition?
---  --- F08/0130  Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped
                  images?
---  --- F08/0131  Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision
                  intentional?
---  --- F08/0132  Can a procedure pointer be declared with an
                  interface block?
---  --- F08/0133  Is unallocated actual associated with
                  nonallocatable dummy OK?
---  --- F08/0134  <stat-variable> in an image control statement
---  --- F08/0135  Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy
                  undefinable?
---  --- F08/0136  Argument correspondence with VALUE and
                  ASYNCHRONOUS
---  --- F08/0137  Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with
                  element size zero
The text of these interpretations is in N2062.  Each interpretation starts 
there with a row of "-"s.

Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send to

        sc22wg5@open-std.org

by 0900 UK time on Monday, 24 August 2015, in order to be counted.

Thanks,

John.